
In case you didn't already know,rock stars die young.
LONDON (AP) — Living fast and dying young has long been part of rock 'n' roll lore.
And now there are statistics that affirm the image, according to a study released Tuesday.
Researchers at Liverpool John Moores University, whose report appeared in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, studied a sample of North American and British rock and pop stars and concluded they are more than twice as likely to die a premature death as ordinary citizens of the same age.
The team studied 1,064 stars from the rock, punk, rap, R&B, electronic and new age genres in the "All Time Top 1,000" albums published in 2000. They compared each artist's age at death with that of European and U.S. citizens of similar backgrounds, sex and ethnicity.
Mark Bellis, leader of the study, said his research showed the stereotype of rock stars was true — recreational drugs and alcohol-fueled parties take a toll.
The report found that, between two and 25 years after the onset of fame, the risk of death was two to three times higher for music stars than for members of the general population matched for age, sex, nationality and ethnic background.
In all, 100 of the stars studied had died — 7.3 percent of women and 9.6 percent of men. They included Elvis Presley, Jim Morrison, Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix.
The average age of death was 42 for North American stars and 35 for European stars.
Long-term drug or alcohol problems accounted for more than one in four of the deaths, the study found. The first years of success are the most dangerous, with both British and American musicians three times more likely to die than the average person during that time.
While the music world is not only filled but also fueled these days by aging music stars — Paul McCartney, Willie Nelson, the Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan among them — industry observers were not surprised by the findings.
"Being a pop star is a crash-and-burn sort of lifestyle," said rock journalist and broadcaster John Aizlewood. "If you go into it, you want adulation. You want to respond to the crowd. You can't be a pop star in isolation. If you need that adulation, you obviously have other needs.
"It was ever thus. If you look back to Victorian times — Byron, Shelley those kind of people — being creative requires living on the edge in a way that being in insurance doesn't."
Dr. Tim Williams, a psychiatrist specializing in addiction at the University of Bristol, also said the increased mortality might be a byproduct of the artistic personality.
"You could argue that rock stars and pop stars have a sensation-seeking personality, that they have this desire to put themselves in these terrifying situations — performing in front of a large group of people — that also makes them vulnerable to dependence on substances, which markedly increases mortality," he said.
In good news for aging rockers, the study found that after 25 years of fame, stars' death rates began to return to normal — at least in Europe. A European star still living 25 years after achieving fame faces a similar mortality rate to the European public. U.S. artists, however, continue to die in greater numbers.
The study said this difference "might be explained by differences in longer-term experience of fame, with more performing in later years ... continued media interest and associated stress and substance use in North American pop stars."
Additionally, said Bellis, "Many (U.S. musicians) die in poverty and there is not the same type of public-health provision there" as in Europe.
"The music business would do well to take the health risks of substance abuse and risk-taking behaviors more seriously," wrote Bellis, the lead author of the study.
"This is not only because of the long-term effects on the stars themselves, but also because of the influence these stars exert on others."
Dr. Francis Keaney, an expert in addiction treatment at the Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London, said the death rates are likely to fall in the future.
"People are better educated about drug and alcohol abuse than they were in the past," Keaney said. "Thirty years ago, you could name dozens of people living hedonistic lifestyles in the music industry. Today there are far fewer."
What profession do think would lead to a longer life? Have you considered this as you decide what to be "when you grow up?"

17 comments:
Thomas G.-1st
I think any profession that has the least amount of job-related stress would increase a worker's life expectancy. There is already so much stress that comes with raising a family, a high-profile job only increases that stress. Any job that has a good balance of pay and stress-freeness sounds good to me.
Laura B 5th period
I imagine to a certain degree any profession in the health care industry could lead to a longer life because you are more aware of the health effects and therefore would probably be smart enough to remain relatively healthier. Knowing the ill health effects in general of drugs and alcohol should now allow all to live better, longer lives than previous generations, especially longer than rock stars as the article says; knowledge can only bring improvement in this case.
The profession that would lead to a longer life should be one that has nothing to do with alcohol, drugs and also - stress. The last one is the hardest one to avoid, which means we should do the job which we would most likely enjoy. In my opinion there is no pone rofession that would lead to a longer life - if we like our job we would live not only longer, but also happier.
Gabler M. 2nd
Cori F. 5th period
Low stress jobs such as office work would probably lead to the longest lives, although physically active jobs like teaching dance or coaching sports would probably lengthen life as well. I have not thought of long term effects on my life, but now i will...
Leah B. 2nd Period
I think that it isn't always necessarily what you do but how you do it. If you do not enjoy the place where you spend "9-5", then most likely the job will have negative effects on both your mental and physical health-as they are interconnected. I hope to find an occupation that I will enjoy-if not all the time, most of the time. In regards to the music profession, it isn't dubbed the motto "party like a rockstar" without justification.
Nichole C. 1st Period
I believe that if you do not enjoy your profession and it continually stesses you out then it could have serious medical effects. The stress could lead to anxiety attacks or even worse problems later on.
Ty P. 5th period.
Hollywood has indeed turned out some of the most pathetic individuals out there. It seems as people become famous, they don't know how to handle the fame. Lower profile jobs in lower profile cities would probably be ideal for living a healthier life.
JR N. 5th period
Obviously health related occupations such as those of dieticians, or personal trainers are likely to yield a longer life, but as far as other occupations go, stress is probably the greatest factor. For one man, lower wages might have him frustrated trying to provide, while the office work may ruin another's livelihood. Finding a job that will help one live longer is not important but finding a job that makes one happy is. And being happy and less stressed will likely prove vital to one's longevity.
Matthew K. 1st
Obviously any career that involves the health care program would decrease the likelihood of premature death. A desirable career would be one that promotes healthy living and reduces the opportunity of creating any undesirable health risks.
Rebecca S. 5th
Any profession that someone truly enjoys will lead to a longer life because they will be happier. I think a stressful job that you enjoy would be more beneficial than a low stress job that you hate. Also, working as a nurse or doctor would probably lead to a longer life because of the increased medical knowledge despite the long hours and stress that their jobs entail.
I think the reason this study is valid is because of the extreme pressure put on these stars. It is thier fault that they choose a life of drug and alcohol abuse, but it must be kinda tough to have to endure the expectations that come with the territory. So i say if you want to be a rock star and not be one of the statistics you had better be a very strong individual!!!
Justin Pena 2nd
laura h 2nd
Of course having jobs as nutritionists and fittness insturcters could possibly lead to longer life because they have the training in what people need to be healthy, but that certainly doesn't have much bearing on whether or not a person uses their training. Its always ironic to see a doctor in scrubs smoking outiside the hospital. What matters is how much you enjoy your job and respect yourself. Those are factors that can determine wellness and encourage longer life.
Rock Stars- like any other breed of performer- are paid to please. They are paid to flaunt the excess-driven lifestyle that is so idolized and realistically admired in societies all throughout time. The sad truth of the wrong aspects of life being glorified should be saved for another conversation, however. As far as the ability for rock stars to attain a healthy long life goes, it's achievable but there has to be a distinct separation between the life one leads on their own and the one that's displayed in the spot light. tThe life of excess is going to destroy any mere mortal.. it's a miracle Keith Richards still has the ability to tinkle in a toilet without any medical assistance...or does he? People can't put their bodies through the amount of substance abuse rock stars do and expect to come out of it unscathed. Additionally, performers of any typed need their personal lives, too, if they expect to withhold any type of personal relationship whatsoever. Maintaining a relatively low profile and keeping a distinction between the spot light and personal rational life really IS the key to a healthy life in an unhealthy profession that requires public image and high stress. Look at Alice Cooper: the man acts worse than satan on stage yet plays golf tournaments in pink polos every single saturday.
Kayla H
What's sad is, you don't necessarily have to be famous to get caught up in this stuff...simply pursuing a career in the music industry is a difficult thing that often causes one to compromise his or her beliefs. In order to become well-known, you have to play in bars and start creating an image by hanging with a certain crowd of people. I have family members that tried to make it big, and it wrecked their lives totally. Other jobs can be stressful, but usually the environment is much better than what you would encounter with being a rock star.
Lauren R. 5th
Any occupation where there is an incentive to stay healthy and physically fit, while reducing chances of getting caught up in a hazardous addiction. Although the military can be a very dangerous career, I feel that it is a perfect example of a profession that keeps one fit.
Marcus L. (6th)
Lindsay N. 1st period
I dont think the job you choose necessarily affects how long you live. It is more your lifestyle. A rockstar with the lifestyle typically of drinking and doing drugs regularly will obviously not live as long as a school teacher with a family.
angela 1st period
Life is too short to always be stressed and worried about things. And yes, some people think drugs and alcohol "cure" the stress. But everyone knows they are not healthy and can cause many many problems, but rock stars have that reputation, and i guess it just stuck through all this time, even still today when we know better.
If we chose jobs that we love, we will never work a day in our lives, therefore we will never be stressed!
Post a Comment