
From Newsweek.
by Daniel Gross
Monetary policy, the management of global companies and the workings of Wall Street are indisputably the realms of the mature: one searches the gallery of Federal Reserve chairman portraits in vain for a full head of hair. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, I realized I hadn't seen so much silver hair since the 5 p.m. early-bird special dinner at Le Rivage in Boca Raton, Fla. The presence of all these wizened professionals should instill a good deal of confidence. When you're trying to bring a massive tanker to port amid stormy seas, the last thing you want to see is a 12-year-old apprentice steering the tugboat.
Yet in these turbulent times, Wall Street traders are the infants and toddlers. They're the tykes who stage public tantrums, screaming and yelling and writhing on the floor until they get what they want. Since the markets began to buckle last summer, what traders want is interest-rate cuts and other government measures to bail out banks from reckless and disastrous lending and investment decisions. In response, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke has done what any exhausted parent does when a child screams for three hours straight: he gives in. In the past two weeks, the Fed cut interest rates sharply twice, taking the Federal Funds rate down from 4.25 percent to 3 percent.
Of course, "giving in to a tantruming child just reinforces the demand," says Dr. Wendy Mogel, a clinical psychologist in Los Angeles and author of the wildly popular parenting tome "The Blessing of a Skinned Knee." And each time you cave to a screaming child, it buys you less quiet. The Federal Reserve's latest attempt to calm the market's tantrums—the half-point interest-rate cut on Wednesday—bought about 90 minutes of market silence. Within hours, as poor economic news continued to materialize, the clamor for further rate cuts began to rise. Mogel puts it in starkly financial terms: "Indulge tantrums and you get short-term gains and long-term loss."
If traders are the toddlers, investment bankers—and the CEOs they report to—are the tweens of the system, plagued by attention-deficit disorder. As we speak, your typical Wall Street managing director is glancing at CNBC in his office, intermittently checking six computer screens, thumbing out e-mails on his BlackBerry, barking out orders to a personal assistant—all the while furiously working out on the elliptical machine. Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Bear, Stearns take great pains to distinguish themselves from one another. But they all lurch together from hot financial trend to hot financial trend the way tweens ditch yesterday's pop stars for today's (goodbye, Britney; hello, Hannah Montana). Like proto-teens, bankers are incapable of exercising independent judgment. Which is why every bank—from the staid Swiss to the sharp trading houses on Wall Street—got caught up in the subprime debacle. Alan Hilfer, a child psychologist at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y., notes that investment bankers behave like kids in a candy store. "The candy is money. And when they see an opportunity to get more of what they want, they go after it without considering the consequences." The financial system has an upset stomach today precisely because every large financial institution gorged on subprime candy.
If Park Avenue bank headquarters are like middle school, Davos, which attracts truly senior bankers and financial statesmen, is like high school. It' got the jocks (the heads of state and CEOs), the cheerleaders (journalists), the cool guy in the garage band whom all the girls love (Bono) and a lot of math and science geeks (Bill Gates, economists, technology evangelists). As in high school, the culmination of the year is the big dance (the Google party). Two weeks have passed, but I still can't shake the vision of talking head David Gergen's getting down—it's available on YouTube if you dare.
There's a final, telling way in which the markets exhibit childlike behavior. Children typically display an unwillingness to reckon with the fallout of their own actions. They look to parents to pick them up when they fall, and spare them from the consequences of their own behavior. And parents will go to great lengths to insulate their offspring from the jolts the world can deliver.
The same might be said about Washington's current economic ministrations. The nation is now nursing a seriously skinned knee because of reckless behavior in housing and credit. But rather than force consumers, borrowers and bankers to face the consequences of their own actions, Washington is functioning as a helicopter parent. Harvard economist Ricardo Hausmann, who characterized America as "whiner of first resort," believes the rush to stimulus is being led more by a concern for Wall Street than a concern for Main Street. Rather than take their lumps after several years of exceptional returns, the banks are furiously lobbying for help. They're getting it.
Instead of looking to the Federal Reserve or Congress to bail them out, the people who dominate the global economy should engage in some introspection—to evaluate what they did wrong and how they could avoid screwing up in the future. As Wendy Mogel puts it: "Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment."

13 comments:
I agree with the article, the heads of the stock markets and national banks need to stop being bailed out by the government. They need to learn their lesson- which should be to stop giving out more money than they have. CEO's of banks and financial statesmen need to see that what they're currently doing isn’t working, and choose another way of making the economy successful.
-Kimmie Kruczek- 2nd
I agree with Gross when he said that the Wall Street traders were like infants when they scream until they get what they want, but when you give them what they want, they keep wanting more and more.
It is just the same as in the
1930's when Britain and France gave Hitler whatever he wanted and it came back to bite them.
Steven Giesbrecht 2nd
I agree with Wendy Mogel when he says that "Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment." You learn from your mistakes, so if you never take responsibility for them, you never learn how to avoid them in the future.
-Josh Wilson 1st
I like how Gross compares the World Economics Forum to high school.
Regardless, the writer makes a good point. Most of the time, we (as investors) are fooled by the Fed into thinking lowered interest rates equals profit.
This is also why the banks need to get a grip on things. Even during a housing boom, they shouldn't have lent so much money to people who can't pay it back. Loss of profit not only hurts the bank itself but the entire economy. Investors see the loss of profit and either sell their existing shares or abstain from buying more shares. As a result, the stock market plunges, forcing the Fed to raise rates again to get people to invest more.
It's a shame we have such people in the Federal Reserve Chair...they know NOTHING! (as Jim Cramer would say)
Randy Moore, 1st Period
I agree with the writer of the article, wall street traders do seem to be like the infants of society. But you can't really blame them, their method works (intrest rate cuts), so why would they bail on the method that obviously benefits them? The obvious question (and seemingly most complicated) is how to convince traders NOT to beg and whine, and actually solve the problem on their own. But this is subsequently hard to do when congress is giving in every time the investers push. If only there was a way for the federal reserve and congress to smack traders up side the head a couple of times...
Chris Woldstad
1st period
My favorite quote from this article is "each time you cave to a screaming child, it buys you less quiet." This is absolutely true (I've experienced it at my house), and I think the government needs to do what it knows is good for the economy rather than worry about what the ignorant population thinks is best.
Morgan Cooper 5th
ya. it gets to a point where you have to suffer the consequences of your mistakes. if your constantly getting bailed then you don't mind the risk then you'll continue to make the same bad choices. and of course like a spoiled child whine when it doesn't go your way. Perhaps,they are too smart for their own good...and everyone else needs to realize it and let them suffer their poor choices.
Elizabeth Custy 1st
the greed of the bankers is the reason why our economy is suffering. if they hadn't wanted to charge high interest rates on high risk borrowers, we wouldnt be in our current situation. there has never been an instance where greed has had a positive outcome. the bankers acted irresponsibly and now the entire country is paying for it.
emily yandell 5th
I find it incredibly humorous that they quoted a parenting psychologist to talk about traders on Wall St. I think the writer hit the nail on the head when he says they need to stop "looking to the Federal Reserve or Congress to bail them out." The people that are responsible for the mess need to handle it just as everyone else in the world has to.
DJ Guthrie II 5th
I agree with the article and it sucks that traders behave that way in order to get what they want. But honestly, will they ever change? Probably not. Wall Street is not the only part of our society that acts according to instant whims and ignores the consequences they will receive. In my mind, this is how most institutions function in our capitalist society.
Jenna Spears 1st
I agree with what Daniel Gross is saying about how the constant complaining and bickering by the wall street traders only getings them more stuff and doesn't eliminate the problem. They need to step up and take responsibility in order to be better for the future.
Trevor Bell 2nd Period
I agree with the article. Giving in to a child when he or she whines and complains only leads to more whining and complaining. The ignorant masses clearly have no idea what is actually good for the national economy, so it is very unwise to follow their advice. Those who study economics are the most capable of making smart decisions about the US economy, and they should take responsibility and make their own decisions. In the end, people will be grateful, maybe.
Emily Privett, 2nd Period
This article is very true. You shouldnt faulter to a screaming child and give them what they want. You should stick to what you know is the right thing to do. The same goes for the stock markets. Just because the traders and the bankers are crying doesnt mean you should give them what they want.
Renee Purdy.
1st period.
Post a Comment